Category Archives: Uncategorized

TAKE BACK OUR TOWN!

Ironically, that was the tag line Janet Joakim used on her Recall Election signs in 2008, as if the “malcontents” were taking over the town.  Joakim was Town Council President at the time, and never missed an opportunity to shove that reality down people’s throats.  If ever there was a classic case of an idiotic abuse of power in Barnstable, it had to be when Joakim held the reigns as BTCP.

Verbally and in writing over the years Joakim has advised Barnstable residents not to look at any blogs about the town, except hers, of course, not to sign petitions that she didn’t personally approve, not to believe or join anyone in exercising opinions contrary to the official town spin on any particular issue, and most recently, Janet Joakim actually told readers of the Barnstable Patriot, by way of the column she is offered (not entitled to) as a councilor, NOT TO READ THE BARNSTABLE PATRIOT.

Joakim should try reading books before she burns them.

Janet Joakim played a large role in the highly public and effective bashing six of her fellow councilors, most of whom supported her at the time of her recall, characterizing them as a “gang” who “fired” the town manager.

Joakim should’ve been more careful what she wished for, because now she finds herself in a council minority, to the chagrin of most of the old boy network.

With Chirigotis nailed to the council president’s chair, the old boy minority can still maintain the appearance as having control.  For example, despite the failed attempt to eliminate public comment, Chirigotis has pushed it back at least an hour for the past several meetings, and public speakers are almost always limited to two minutes, causing moments of tension because folks are rarely permitted to finish their thoughts.

Understandably, the council wants to move on to doing the business of the town as swiftly as possible, and public comment can be tiresome, especially if it’s the same people saying the same thing meeting after meeting.

What needs to be clarified and repeated as often as possible is that the folks who pay the taxes in this town ARE the town.  It’s OUR town.  It doesn’t just belong to a group of talking heads or old white men, and we should all have reasonable access to and consideration from every elected and appointed official in our town.

If you were a regular viewer of town council meetings over the past five or so years, you should have noted the evolution of a general contempt of the public from many on the town council.  The Stewart’s Creek fiasco was probably the best example of the network in action, although the folks who fought for “creekers” rights ended up getting them a much better deal than they’d initially been dealt – at 11pm – when no one was looking.

Greg Milne was the councilor for Stewart’s Creek at that time, and showed zero compassion for his constituents in Stewart’s Creek because his home was already sewered.  Mlne had always represented himself as “a man of the people”, and was the only councilor to hold regular open meetings with those people.  Rather than try to reason, or help negotiate a better deal on behalf of his constituents, Milne opposed them every step of the way.  For his lousy attitude, he earned a trip to a recall election.

A regular commenter on this blog has regularly suggested that Fred Chirigotis has earned his own trip to a recall election, but I don’t believe a recall would effectively change much of anything outside of creating more contempt from a certain faction of the council towards the general public.  Besides, I’d rather let the goat keep chewing away at his own credibility with his sleazy maneuvers and snipey comments. 

An organic awakening of a sleepy voting population has evolved since last year’s town hall implosion.  This blog has inexplicably doubled in readership over the past six months, and I can only speculate about the cause by looking at various search terms people use to find this site. 

Let’s face it, with Klimm gone, and the thugs on the council outnumbered, there is a perception that “the wrong people” might slip into positions of power/influence/control. 

Consider the mindset of the e-mail’s author (Janet Joakim) about the town manager:

“Please forward carefully!  There is an organized effort to contact councilors and the new councilors are influenced by this group because they don’t know who they are and what they were doing this past year.  Please contact councilors and tell them not to spend any money, we have good people, who we know well – right here at home…. this town needs to heal and repair it’s reputation….” 

Joakim and her ilk on the council think voters are idiots.  I didn’t see any “organized effort”.  Folks I spoke to just thought it would be irresponsible not to look around before filling such large shoes.  Once he took the money and ran, it became apparent that Klimm was also part of the problem.

Now we’re left with Klimm’s kingdom, and no Klimm.  We can’t rebuild or heal if we have the same generals of the oppressing army still operating as if there were no regime change.

Maniacal Joakim went on to warn that: “The same group who was behind, and even including, the councilors who removed John Klimm are now trying to influence the process of hiring a new town manager.”

OH ME WHISKERS!  ACTUAL TOWN COUNCILORS WANT TO DO THEIR JOB!  SAY IT AIN’T SO!!!

Amazingly John Norman, ever the gentleman, publicly spoke about how well everyone got along with Joakim’s fine leadership on the sub-committee, even after Joakim tried, again, to create all kinds of animosity towards him for his opinions on the matter. (http://barnstablesewers.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/stop-the-madness/)

Part of the reason Joakim has to deal with Norman on the council at all is because of her busybody interference in the Blanchard’s Liquor Store construction, which ultimately caused the walkout of nearly the entire ZBA board about four years ago. 

The ONLY reason I’m blogging today is because of Joakim’s interference in my neighborhood issues beginning five years ago.  I had no idea how to blog, and didn’t even know what a blog was until that year.  When Joakim started bashing my SIX YEAR OLD CHILD on her blog, I learned pretty damn fast.

Apparently she’s still stirring it up somewhere, as I’ve gotten some strange random inquiries about her “history” over the past few days.  Has Karma finally come a knockin’ for skanky pants?

Of course, Janet Joakim isn’t the only problem, but she’s the longest sitting councilor on the dias, and she’s beholden to a whole lot of people who’ve covered her through a great many battles.

We’ve finally got some real ladies and gentlemen on the council, and should not have to deal with any more shennanigans from the pastey faced creeps huddled around the goat.

If you see anyone at the post office or the dump circulating petitions to restore public comment to it’s rightful place at the beginning of a meeting, or for instructions to the town manager to order review of the legal department, or any other petition that might restore our town to it’s rightful order, please be kind and sign.

Towns weren’t meant to be litigators.

Comments

Butch G. | March 18, 2012 at 11:50 | Reply | Edit

I don’t know if you saw this but it is from the BPD log on The Barnstable Patch:

8:44 pm – Police responded to an assist at town hall, arrest made. Police arrested Patrick Page of 1780 Main St., West Barnstable for disorderly conduct, disturbing a public assembly and resisting/obstructing arrest.

  • The arrest happened at Thursday’s night’s council meeting

  • Taryn Thoman | March 19, 2012 at 20:10 | Reply | Edit

    Yea – I heard. I’ve been out of town.

    Saddened to hear about Howard Penn’s passing. I really liked him, and have a lot of respect for his wife, Betty. I heard the service was a wonderful tribute, and sorry I missed it.

    As for Patrick, I did look at the video, and it appears his arrest was planned ahead of time. The chief was careful to motion Patrick over to the door, away from camera view. Folks who were there said it was strange because Patrick was very calm, and then there was a bunch of yelling and a thud.

    The video on town site cut the volume right after Patrick walked towards the door, which may indicate the town is trying to cover something up – it’s hard to say.

    From personal experience I can tell you that MacDonald bends over backwards for the mob to keep his job. He acts like Mr. Nice guy to his prey just before he bites their heads off.

    I really don’t know what happened, but I do know that my gut is usually right, and my gut says this was premeditated. Patrick walked into a trap set by the goat and carried out by his bullies in blue.

  • The council meeting started at 7pm but public comment did not begin until about 8:20pm because Fred had three workshops scheduled.

    Before Patrick Page spoke during public comment, Albert Russo tried to speak about Ruth Weil and the town building commissioner’s action toward Albert Russo and his wife. Fred Chirigotis refused to allow Albert Russo to speak about Ruth and or the building commissioner which clearly upset Albert Russo.

    Patrick Page came to the podium after Albert Russo finished his comments. The first thing Patrick did was to criticize Fred for the way he treated Albert Russo. Patrick followed that with his usual list of grievances about his land on Buttonwood Lane. During is comments Patrick remain calm and did not raise his voice. After he finished speaking Patrick returned to his seat at the rear of the room.

    A couple of minutes later Fred asked for response to public comment and no other councilor had anything say. When no response was offered that’s what set Patrick off and made him start yelling. He was escorted out of the room and allegedly refused to calm down which resulted in his arrest. The thud heard outside the hearing room was Patrick being push against a wall to restrain him and handcuff him.

    According to additional reports that are circulating there is a lot more to this..

  • The regime change is causing a major power struggle with the tiny little minds in town govt. They want to appear united and strong, but the councilors who changed their minds on the “workshop” scheme and the town manager issue overturned the rotten apple cart.

    Now they want to intimidate the public, who has gained ground at the top rung of the pile. It couldn’t be more obvious if they published a manifesto.

    There will be a blowback for those actions. I don’t think there is overwhelming public sympathy for Patrick, because, at some point, he should have understood that he needed to take a different tact against the cold blooded monsters. They figured he could scream until he had no voice, but they underestimated him.

    The haughty arrogance of ridiculously insecure people like Chirigotis, Weil and Joakim will be their downfall. I am disappointed to see that Barton isn’t much better.

    While a lot of folks will say “enough is enough”, with all of Patrick’s outbursts, I think the subject of his civil rights might be a real issue when the matter gets to court.

    The Limoncelli case proved something most of us already know – that there’s a deeply imbedded good ole boy network here, and they selectively enforce whatever they want, depending on the individuals involved. This kind of stuff runs through every department – not just the bldg dept.

    We need to start asking for independent investigations of every department, starting with legal.

  • When Patrick was arraigned on Friday morning Fred Chirigotis was in the courtroom and requested that the judge ban Patrick from all town buildings. However the judge refused to do so telling Fred that it was up the town to ban people from town owned buildings and properties.

    There was also an brief verbal exchange between Fred and Patrick with Patrick saying to Fred that he was arrested because of Fred. Fred allegedly responded by saying “Imagine that!”

    Fred blew it and in my opinion the only recourse is a recall election for Fred. He needs to be pried out of the president’s chair ASAP.

  • Taryn Thoman | March 20, 2012 at 14:49 | Reply | Edit

    I’d do that in a heartbeat if I thought there’d be enough public support, but there’s not. Besides, this year’s election cycle will pry enough asses out of council chairs to substantially change the whole complexion of the council.

    Daley and the goat will be a minority of two.

  • The next election cycle is not until 2013 there is no council election this year. All 13 seats will be on the ballot in the 2013 election due to the 2000 census which resulted in the precinct map being redrawn.

    So unless there is a recall we are stuck with Fred in the president’s chair until December of this year. At which point Barton, Rugo or Joakim are the most likely to replace him as president. unless he does the unimaginable and seeks a fifth term as president.

    His term of office as a councilor expires in November 2013

  • Taryn Thoman | March 20, 2012 at 15:44 | Reply | Edit

    oh, yeah, forgot about the precinct lines.

    You said the goat was in court for Patrick’s arraignment – under what possible authority could he ask a judge to ban Page from town bldgs?

    Did you mean that the goat got the prosecutor to do it? Was it a verbal motion, or what?

    In cases of violent crime, victims can and do recieve protection from judges by way of restraining orders, but Patrick wasn’t charged with any kind of assault, was he?

    I’m not getting how Chirigotis presented himself to the court – in what capacity?

  • Chirigotis asked the DA to seek the ban from Judge O’Neil sorry if I did not make that clear. Judge O’Neil responded that town had the authority to ban Patrick from all town buildings.

    Apparently Fred was there as President of the Town Council and not as an attorney.

  • Taryn Thoman | March 20, 2012 at 16:44 | Reply | Edit

    Hmmm. Miss “card carrying member” of the ACLU had better get her little legal ducks in order if she wants to ban a taxpayer from all town buildings for simple disorderly conduct. Like I said, Patrick wasn’t charged with assault.

    I’m aware that patience has worn thin with Patrick’s outbursts, but it doesn’t make sense that they arrested him this particular time, and not the fifty thousand other times, when he acted much worse.

    This whole mess is just very sad, and it doesn’t have to be. Ruthless should lose the “so sue me” attitude, and try to nip problems in the bud. This approach would save a ton of money and hardship. It’s time to have an outside evaluation of the legal department, their strategies, expenses, and performance record. If Tom Lynch is really town manager material, he’ll agree to it.

  • Actually Ruthie won’t be the one that bans Patrick it will be Tom Lynch like John Klimm did to Patrick before. The town manager is in charge of all town buildings not Ruthie so it will be Lynch’s decision.

    As for the arrest the charges are:

    disorderly conduct
    disturbing a public assembly
    resisting/obstructing arrest.

    What remains unclear is what happened in the hallway after Patrick left the hearing room. There are conflicting reports claiming the Patrick may or may not have put his hands on Paul MacDonald in the hallway. MacDonald was at the meeting as a department head and the detail officer doing security at the meeting is named Murray. The report on the Barnstable Patch website came from the BPD blog and indicates that a call for backup was made which was responded to by an officer in patrol car.

  • Taryn Thoman | March 20, 2012 at 18:20 | Reply | Edit

    Any decision made by the town manager would have to ultimately land in Ruthless’s office, so while Lynch may ask for it, Weil would have to defend it. I’m sure they’ve talked at length about “the Page problem”.

    Brian Murray is one of the most decent guys I’ve ever met. If he was the cop, and he called for back up, then Patrick must have gotten pretty physical.

    I did hear that Patrick was “as wild as” one witness had ever seen him when approaching the doorway, but that person did not see what happened outside the door.

    Many genuinely sympathetic and concerned residents have tried to help both Patrick and Jane, but the sick truth is that if you don’t file suit against the town, they won’t negotiate.

    Suing the town is a loser’s game because there’s a $100K ceiling on those type suits, and it’ll cost that much to pursue what the town will guarantee to be long and protracted litigation.

    I would like to know if the alleged 1400 lawsuits currently pending against the town are “average” for a town this size. It sure seems like a lot.

  • “I would like to know if the alleged 1400 lawsuits currently pending against the town are “average” for a town this size. It sure seems like a lot.”

    This statement is not accurate there are not 1400 lawsuits on going against the town. This comes from a table printed one page 101 in the 2010 annual report provided as part of Ruthie’s legal department report. There are 1529 “Legal Matters” being handled by Ruthie’s office but not all of them are lawsuits. Anytime a legal issue, question or concern arises in the town, Ruthie opens a file for that issue under the heading “Legal Matters”.

    Many times these “Legal Matters” are merely as simple as a legal questions from a board, committee or department head. Each time the town council has a question for Ruthie and she tells them she will have research it and get back to them, she opens a “Legal Matters” file for that question or concern.

    The idea of “1400 lawsuits” arose from Gary Lopez misrepresenting the facts on his blog awhile back and claiming that the phrase “Legal Matters” was synonymous with the word “Lawsuits”.

    According to the 2010 Annual Report which is verifiable through the courts there are 49 open lawsuits against the town and that number has probably changed since the 2010 Annual Report was published

  • Taryn Thoman | March 21, 2012 at 09:01 | Reply | Edit

    Lopez misrepresenting the facts? Shocking!

    Gary doesn’t distinguish between facts and opinion, which is why reasonable people don’t pay attention to his rants anymore. It’s too bad, really, because he has real moments of clarity. The ironic part is that he lies just as much as the liars he attacks. He and Joakim are two coo-coo birds from the same flock.

    I just looked over public comment from first week of March, and took note of what Jane Saunders said about towns not being designed to automatically litigate against residents.

    Regardless of what Patrick did or didn’t do to get arrested, the root of the problem lies with the town attorney’s office. I personally met with Weil when my problems began. Joakim was misrepresenting her blog as a town sponsored blog, and openly attacking private citizens with delight. No one could believe what a monster the woman was. I felt surely the town attorney would advise her to knock it off, but she said it wasn’t her problem.

    I went to the chief of police, and he assured me he would help – he even sent a fake detective (Mark Delaney) to come over to my house and talk about the problems. I’ll never trust a Barnstable Police officer again.

    We’ve had little problems here with the usual suspects lately. Most people would freak out and call the cops immediately, but what’s the point? They are still pissed about having been duped by the dimwits next door. Given the opportunity, they’d set me up again. If I have a real problem I’ll probably have to call the state police.

    I think a similar reality is at work with Patrick Page. He was heralded as David against the Goliaths of town hall. Then he let Lopez repeatedly rub their noses in it.

    I was sitting about 20 feet from Patrick when he slammed his hand on the dias at that first March meeting, and was disturbed by it. Folks, especially the elderly in the room, should not have to deal with that kind of rage.

    Now that he’s been arraigned on charges, I’m sure the goat will try to stop anyone from talking about Patrick’s situation, similar to how he tried to shut down Bert Russo.

    This style of government is very simply oppressive, and certainly not “All-American”. Every business has it’s own style of operating. Some are more flexible than others. As taxpayers, we are the shareholders in our town’s corporation. What corporation handles their shareholders in such contempt, at least in such obvious contempt?

    I submit that the town attorney has a great deal of flexibility in how she addresses issues, and that she is not exercising reasonable means to resolve problems.

    It really is time to get rid of Ruth Weil and, if necessary,everyone like her in the town attorney’s office. An investigation would be a good start, and I suppose that will require a petition. OY>

HAPPY SAINT PATRICK’S DAY!

REMEMBERING CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH

Musings from the Mills

I’d never heard of  Sean Walsh, but he has a lot to say.  Here are his thoughts on the Town Manager issue from “The Patch” of Hyannis/Barnstable, with comments from a few town councilors ~ check it out:

 

Politics & The Tricky Theme of Perception

Should the Council have asked Tom Lynch to stay?

 
 
 
 
Acting Town Manager Tom Lynch said the Town Council will decide tonight whether to approve his salary hike to about $143,000 as he begins a three-month appointment in the job, set to expire on March 15, 2012.
 
 *Editor’s note: two changes have been made below and highlighted with an *.

I am always fascinated by how people view things.

Invariably, there are always the folks who see the proverbial glass as half empty, and those who see the glass as half full.

I confess I hover somewhere in the middle of those two categories – sometimes I feel I can’t help but view things from a pessimistic or even cynical point of view, and other times I am surprised that others do not see the brighter side of a concept, situation or occurrence.

I have been reading about and following the trials and tribulations of the Barnstable Town Council for the past year and was quite ready to move on after last fall’s election, so to speak, from being a constituent with a smattering of concern, to just another casual observer.

The inherent insipidness of politics precluded me, by my sheer perception, from possessing any real desire to voice an opinion about the ongoings in Town Hall on Thursday evenings. I truly viewed the local political landscape as an incestuous sort of minefield where countless hours are frittered away with self-absorbed bickering and petty behind-the-scenes machinations devoid of altruism.

It’s puzzling that I now feel compelled to voice an opinion because it doesn’t appear that much has changed. In brief, the Town Council appointed a subcommittee to prepare a recommendation for the current Town Manager “search,” that subcommittee met and came up with a recommendation, and then the Council against it 8-5; then voted 12-1 (*editor’s note: this vote was to expand the search to be national) to extend the search (*editor’s note: originally said the council voted to spend $30,000 on the search, one estimate from town hall places the cost actually around $20,000 although the costs are yet unknown.) to an “nation-wide search.”

I’d say I was shocked but I cannot do that because I am not. It is business as usual. How can anyone say that the Council is attempting to perfect an aura of “due diligence” when three fat stacks of hundred dollar bills belonging to the taxpayers are being lit on fire all because someone: A) doesn’t like it when they don’t get their own way or B) simply does not like the professionalism, dedication, experience and aptitude of current Interim Town Manager Tom Lynch or C) associates Mr. Lynch with the $500,000 John Klimm debacle or D) cannot open their eyes to see that the taxpayers in this town are hurting while the economy has not been marred since the autumn of 2008.

If we’re going to burn money, why not burn it on adding a new teacher or fireman, rather than let it all ride on something as fruitless as a “National Search?” The entire proposition of political involvement requires at least the guise of loyalty to the constituents one purports to wish to serve by being elected. What good does it do this town to hire some lifetime municipal management guru from El Paso, Texas, while there are any number of qualified people right here in this town? Does anyone perceive that a nation-wide search will result in a less expensive alternative than hiring the current Interim Town Manager?

And how long would someone looking to “retire” to Cape Cod last in the job? Would it not be more sensible and cost-effective to hire someone rooted in the community, who owns a home here, who has a vested interest in things going well for all of us?

Or are we right smack dab back into that same, old, sad song of politicians trying to cull political favor by being the one “credited” with making a “hire.”

The first answer is almost always the best or correct answer, as they say. The Council had it right the first time by its appointment of the subcommittee. The subcommittee’s recommendation was right as well.

The Machiavellian drama that came afterward, as one perception goes, only served to augment the sense among us that there continues to exist an unconquerable, increasingly distasteful duality in this municipality’s central board room.

Well, all except for that single, exceptionally patriotic and brave dissenting vote.

About this column: Each week, columnist Sean Walsh will examine topics of interest within the community. He also writes a weekly blog for the Babylon, NY Patch. Related Topics: barnstable town council and musings from the mills

 

 

 

RON BEATY

7:08 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Sean, very well said. I could not agree with you more. Councilor June Daley was apparently the lone voice of reason in this matter and stuck to her true principles on it. She did NOT waver and succumb to the political pressure orchestrated in part by her former Town Counicil Election rival. She is a role model and the essence of local leadership…

Reply

 

Dennis Falvey

8:46 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

An expanded search is called for to provide the citizens the opportunity to find the best possible candidate for the position. It may be Lynch in the end however the Town must perform it’s due diligence. In fact it was nice to learn that people in the community strongly pushed for an expanded search through numerous phone calls and corespondence to their councilors and the voice of the people over rode the sub committe. We may now have a Town Council who will listen and repond to the citizens rather than simply do what they want to to do without regard to the peoples voice. It’s refreshing.

Reply

 

BUTCH

9:10 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Well said, Dennis! Yes, it is nice to see the iron grip of the council leadership not carrying as much influence on most of the new councilors. Hopefully there will be a growing shift to what is in the best interest of the taxpayers, not the administration and not the control focused council leadership. It is time for change and elimination of the good old boy network that has permeated Barnstable politics for the last six years.

Reply

 

RON BEATY

10:57 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Some friends have contacted me this morning regarding this story and my comment. I will make this one statement, ant then leave it alone. Regarding the comment, with the story as a backdrop, I believe that many of us have found ourselves in a similar situation at some point in our lives, yes? I will always be supportive of anyone who appears to be “the underdog” in a particular situation (I know what it is like too). I would do the same for most members of our community, because it takes guts and I admire that. Please do not take offense or think any less of me. I just happen to march to the beat of a different drum that is all. It does not mean that I dislike another person or party, just because I try to sometimes stick up for another individual or group. I hope people understand what I am trying to say. “Yes” I have “a big mouth” sometimes, but then again we are all entitled to our opinions, right? …and that is all my comment is, just an opinion. I will certainly always listen to and respect the opinions of others as well. Thanks.

Reply

 

Ann

2:09 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Full disclosure: I am a councilor, I voted against the subcommittee recommendation.

Here are some flaws in the gentleman’s argument:

He said that the Council voted 12-1 not to follow the recommendation of the subcommittee.
Actually the Council’s vote was 8-5 against the recommendation. Two members of the subcommittee, apparently having received input from their constituents, voted against their own recommendation (Grassetti and Dagwan) and joined Canedy, Cote, Cullum. Hersey, Norman, and Tinsely in that vote. (Barton, Chirigotis, Daley, Joakim and Rugo voted in favor).

The vote was then taken to Extend the Search. That vote was 12-1 in favor with Daley dissenting.

He said that the Council voted to expend $30,000 to undergo a nationwide search.

The Council did not vote to expend anything and did not define the scope of the search other than to say “external” (i.e outside of the 4 walls of town hall). In fact, searches can and do cost considerably less. (Portsmouth recently took the highest bid and their nationwide search cost $20K)

Reply

 

Ann

2:09 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Because of limited room…here are the rest of my comments:
He suggests we “burn money” on hiring firemen.
We don’t hire firemen. You pay extra taxes in this town for that. (Through District taxes as you know)

He said perhaps we should hire teachers.
We don’t hire teachers either. The School Department does that -their budget is independent.

And $30K won’t go a long way in hiring either in this town.

The Town Council has the sole responsibility of hiring and firing the town manager.

He wonders why we don’t hire someone from “right here in this Town”.

Well, an internal search as defined by the subcommittee would have precluded looking anywhere in this Town EXCEPT for someone on the town payroll.
How old boy network, provincial and naive is it to assume that the only professional that can oversee Barnstable has to be someone who was born and raised here! Nothing wrong with a “managerial guru” with a fresh perspective. The job is after all managerial, not political.

Reply

 

Ann

2:10 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

And the rest of my thoughts:

He asks “how long would someone looking to ‘retire’ to Cape Cod last in the job?

Mr Lynch, who he is promoting and who I respect and about whom have no ill feeling whatsoever, is a contender and is over 65 years old. Using the writer’s logic: How long would he “last in the job”? Should age be a leading criteria?

He says there is some Machiavellian drama going on. Really? Let’s not play the conspiracy card ….again.

He says that the dissenting vote was “exceptionally patriotic and brave”. Egad! Patriotic? I respect her vote and her right to it. But are the rest of us UNpatriotic?

Reply

 

Jen Cullum

3:42 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

As a town councilor, let me just say that the amount of misinformation in this article is astounding. To me, it is one of the biggest problems in this town. Opinion is one thing, but throwing around 25 cent adjectives in lieu of accurate information is just irresponsible. Good for Ann Canedy for speaking up about what really happpened, and what the search really means. Hopefully Barnstable-Hyannis Patch readers consider the source and understand the misinformation. Would that columnists understand that the power of the pen comes with a responsibilty to write the truth.

Reply

 

RON BEATY

4:53 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

@Jen…welcome aboard Councilor Cullum! It is refreshing to see a couple of councilors with such “get up and go” so to speak. Keep up the good work! ^_^

Reply

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon
 

Jennifer Simckowitz

10:03 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

I am happy to get the councilors in on the discussion. I will look into adjusting the language around the vote/cost of the search. I understood what he meant with the 12-1 vote, really being in favor of extending the search – which also really implies the same vote as the 8-5 (against) vote for limiting to internal.

Patch_comments_icon
 

Jennifer Simckowitz

10:17 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Hi, I corrected the two items that were misrepresented. I believe he generalized on two points that could have been clearer. And as always, it’s his opinion, not Patch’s. Cheers!

Reply

 

RON BEATY

10:47 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Thanks for the clarification and correction, Jen! It is appreciated. ^_^

Reply

Taryn Thoman

7:33 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Perhaps the author should stick to sports writing since, by his own admission, he was at best “a constituent with a smattering of concern”.

As pointed out by comments above, this “casual observer” of local politics does not understand the structure of local government, and would benefit from reading the town’s charter, which he may find on the Town of Barnstable website.

The councilors who changed their minds after hearing what their bosses, the taxpayers, had to say about the matter, were “exceptionally patriotic and brave”. They were under pressure from council “leaders”, as demonstrated by the e-mail that circulated among town hallers the week leading up to the vote.

That “Machiavellian drama” was filed with the town clerk, and is now a matter of public record.

While everyone certainly has the right to an opinion, doesn’t the Patch have a responsibility to its advertisers to deliver reasonably intelligent thoughts, or at a minimum, opinions derived from actual facts?

All this demonizing, villifying and ostracizing sounds like unhappy councilors who will lose influence and favoritism by looking beyond the pond.

What’s wonderfully refreshing here is that an actual conversation is taking place between taxpayers and town councilors. Would you consider hosting a forum for such conversations to happen on a regular basis, JS? I’m pretty sure your readership would explode if you did!

Reply

Patch_comments_icon
 

Jennifer Simckowitz

10:43 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Hi Taryn, I agree in welcoming the discussion. There are actual facts in this opinion piece and opinions. Patch gives our community a channel for sharing ideas and opinions- it would be great if more people stepped forward to share their ideas. Thanks for reading.

Reply

Taryn Thoman

6:38 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Were I to read about professional sports in the newspaper with only a “smattering of concern” as a “casual observer”, and then blast someone else’s conspiracy theories in my “musings” about the Super Bowl, folks would be discussing the value of my opinions.

In local politics, you have to learn the game and watch the players regularly over many seasons to understand how situations evolve, and then sometimes spin out of control.

Players on both sides of the Klimm issue dropped the ball, and now the owner (taxpayers) has fired some of the players involved, and keeping an eye on the rest.

Smart players are listening to the owners.

Plenty has changed.

The glass is 8/13ths full!

 

T-shirt Ideas For St. Patrick’s Day…..

STOP THE MADNESS!!!

Joakim’s at it again – I am SOOOOO SICK of this STUPIDITY!!!!!

From: Barnstable CFG <barnstablecfg@gmail.com>

To: <List Suppressed>

Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:29:18 -0500

Subject: Win or lose they are still around – Fwd: BCFG call to action: We need your voices again

Did you get this?

Please forward carefully!  There is an organized effort to contact councilors and the new councilors are influenced by this group because they don’t know who they are and what they were doing this past year.  Please contact councilors and tell them not to spend any money, we have good people, who we know well – right here at home…. this town needs to heal and repair it’s reputation. 

 

We need people who would be willing to come to the meeting on Thursday and we really need people to contact councilors!

We need voices again. The same group who was behind, and even including, the councilors who removed John Klimm are now trying to influence the process of hiring a new town manager. They want to see our town spend thousands of dollars more to do search outside of the town staff, despite that fact that we now have a smoothly running ship and many capable captains in town hall, including Tom Lynch who is now at the helm as an acting town manager. 

 

They are now making phone calls and sending emails to town councilors and showing up to speak at meetings. 

 

On Feb 14 at a meeting of the town manager subcommittee, organized to give direction on the hiring of a new manager, several of the same people who have been in contact w/councilors trying to persuade them to do a search outside of town hall, were present.

 

We need you to contact councilors.  They need to be reminded about the issues that came up in the last election. Contact information is attached and a summary of the issues is below.  It would also help to have letters to the editor and people speaking at town council meetings again. 

Please take a moment to send a message to all councilors and/or even calling your own or all councilors councilor. Councilors do give consideration to people who take the time to contact them.

There is town council meeting this Thursday, March 1. Please consider attending.

 

Town Manager Search Issues:

 

•   Tom Lynch has been working as town manager since Sept without an assistant.

•   The town has run smoothly throughout a tough few months with Tom Lynch at the helm and members of the town staff have confided in members of the council and the coalition that they would like to see things stay the same.

•   Why spend tens of thousands of additional money and to reach out state-wide or nationally when we have a talented pool in town hall.

 

•   A subcommittee of councilors appointed by the council president met for the second time Tuesday Feb 14th – the committee members are Janet Joakim, Chair, Jessica Rapp-Grassetti, John Norman, June Daley and Debra Dagwan.  After a vote of 4-1 the committee will be formally recommending to the full council that they post the town manager’s job, in house. 

•   The same people who supported removing John Klimm are now fully involved in a campaign to contact councilors – email, phone and personal contact – as well as showing up to town council meetings to urge the council to do a wider search for a replacement- outside of our town staff.  This allows them to their own candidates into the process. If the council “casts a wider net” then it becomes a gamble as to who would be hired and how familiar they are with the unique issues in our town.

•   The town’s HR director told the sub-committee that a search will cost $25-30,000 and could take at the very least till July or August, but could easily stretch until next September. It was noted that the acting town manager’s contract is up March 15th and can only be renewed once, for 90 more days.

 

•   The town actually has a policy to promote from within.

•   The town has already spent and committed to spend a significant amount of money for John Klimm’s contract buyout arranged by a 6-5 vote of the last council:

•   Expected appropriation for salary paid since December 15, 2011 through June 30, 2012: $81,000.  (An appropriation will be on the March 1st Town Council Agenda)

•   Next fiscal year – salary from July 1, 2012 through March 2013: $113,861.00.

•   Already paid: $47,000 unused vacation, $5100 disability insurance.

•   Health through this June will be: $993 per month and then drop to $898 per month through March 2013. 

•   And there is still a sick-time buy-back that has to be calculated but might be around $5000.

 

•   During the subcommittee discussion, when it was suggested that the voters had spoken last November and we should avoid any further unnecessary expenses as well as keep things running as smooth as possible, John Norman, the one dissenting vote, said he had to disagree that the voters spoke. He said he had added up all of the votes in favor of those candidates who supported John Klimm and it was “only 55-45%” and he didn’t feel that was a strong message. 

•   Mr. Norman also claimed that by having the acting town manager working at a lower salary and with no assistant, the town is not spending more money, but is in fact saving money. Furthermore he said that back in the late 90’s, when John Klimm started he was told he couldn’t hire an assistant for three months, and the council could do the same with a new town manager, thereby saving even more money.

•   At another point in the meeting Mr. Norman, stated that he wanted to go on record saying that he felt pressed for time because subcommittee was only formed at the end of January and began meeting in early Feb. He felt a committee should have been formed sooner; he stated that he planned to say that publicly at the next council meeting.  In fact, the president of the council was asked by John Klimm to give him until January to make a decision. Part of the reasoning for that was to give new councilors a chance to feel comfortable in their roles.  But the main reason was that after listening to voters during the last election campaigns, who seemed to want Mr. Klimm to return, President Chirigotis gave him the opportunity to decide.  Until days before his announcement that he would be taking the job in Portsmouth, Mr. Klimm had suggested that he would like to meet with members when a town manager subcommittee was formed to discuss possibly coming back.

 

 

Once again the same group who worked behind the scenes to remove John Klimm is now trying to influence the issue of who would be our next town manager and we need your participation.

 Please contact councilors (new contact information sheet is attached) and let them know there are other voices out there besides that small vocal group who support the dissenting votes.  Please note – when you send an email to a councilor who uses the email address councilor@town.barnstable. etc. it will be given to ALL councilors unless you ask to have it delivered to particular town councilor. It is always best to email councilors who have email addresses using their personal emails addresses.

It’s The Charter, Stupid!

The hot topic at tonight’s council meeting will be the recommendation for or against a diligent search for a new town manager from a sub-committee led by village idiot Janet Joakim.

Allowing Joakim to lead a conversation of this importance is akin to putting Snookie on the Lecturn at Sunday Mass.  Hideous and negligent.

Arguing over whether or not to conduct a country wide search after the council mess of last year is as meaningful as debating the existence of climate change.  It’s stupid, and a fat waste of time.

Sadly, that’s what our town leadership has become over the past ten or so years: stupid and wasteful.

If the Building Department can be run like an ATM machine right under the nose of the town manager, then what’s going on in all the other departments?

Obviously there’s a serious problem in the town attorney’s office that few wish to address.  How many cases does Ruth Weil have to blow before someone starts paying attention? 

Smoke blowers like Joakim want you to believe we don’t need to look beyond town hall walls for a new town manager because it will cost too much money.

The cost is thirty grand.  We saw how little $30K was when Crocker did his shell game and forced the taxpayers into a separate election they didn’t want, at their own expense, to kill a ballot question that challenged the “wisdom” of the council decision on 100% betterments for sewerage.  It was like watching them throw $30K in the garbage can. 

If you’ve read the documents posted here over the past week, you know that the town was paying an ignorant abusive contractor $30K to perform solely at her own discretion.  Her bills were unspecific and unchallenged.  John Klimm thanked her for all the “hard work”, although he had zero oversight as to what, if any work had actually been performed.

The second argument we’re hearing from the moron of C’vlle is that the town charter does not allow enough time, at this stage in the search, for a search beyond the bridge.

Is the charter clear on this issue, or is this up to the interpretation of our town attorney?  I belive it’s perfectly clear that we have options in pursuing a diligent search, but agenda driven dorks in town hall may argue otherwise.

Keep in mind that Ruth Weil insisted that the charter was “clear” on the issue of Greg Milne serving as both a town councilor and member of the charter commission.  After months of wrangling in Superior Court, Ruth was proved wrong about the direction of the charter, and Milne was seated.

Did Ruthless really believe she was right about the charter, or did she just refuse to seat Milne for obvious political reasons?  The answer doesn’t matter.  Either way she is not fit to serve as our town’s attorney.

Our funky form of government has allowed tribes of weak and lazy villagers to gain leadership positions and encourage generally small minded attitudes toward real growth in our communities.  The most obvious growth in Barnstable lately has been its homeless population.  Is homelessness the new “All America” image these days?  If so, we’ve got other towns beat face down!

All hope is not lost, however.  The C’ville mob lost their attempt to cripple the voices at the “top rung” of local government when voters appeared before the vote and objected to the scam about monthly “workshops”, which would effectively cut public comment in half.

Two of the councilors who’d sponsored the bill decided to vote against it.  Wonder of wonders!  Could it be that open minds still exist in town government?  I see it as a small blossom with a tender root, but with gentle nurturing and attention, it could grow and possibly even strangle the older, rotting roots.

Joakim and her ilk on the council desperately want the good ole boys (and gals) to stay put, for self-serving purposes.  We’ve all seen this fear game before.  We had to “act swiftly” to get the “Obama money” before it all dried up in Stewart’s Creek.  The deadline was yesterday, blah, blah, blah.

The deadline was a moving target, as were the stories about nitrogen overloading and failed septic systems. 

The charter allows creative employment of the town manager position, and a rush to fill the seat will benefit few.

I don’t think all councilors understand the charter, and relying on Ruthless to interpret it for them, especially in light of the Milne decision, is negligent.

Check out Jessica Rapp Grasetti’s attitude towards reading the charter in this video – it’s scary:

As my readers know, I am not a fan of personally appearing at town council meetings.  The last one I attended was in September 2010.  I didn’t know it at the time, but I was seriously ill with blood poisoning (I spent a week in the hospital shortly after the meeting).  Despite feeling lousy, I stayed for response to public comment, but Chirigotis did not even open the floor to council response.  So much for being at the “top rung”.

Tonight is one of those rare occasions when it really matters that residents show up and speak out against foolish actions of the council.

I don’t know what Joakim’s committee will recommend, but the “top rungers” need to show up and demand – D E M A N D – a diligent search for the best possible candidates for the permanent town manager position.

It’s clear that we have had little oversight of our town departments for far too long.  The reasons against looking beyond the bricks on South Street have been manufactured for only the most blissfully ignorant town residents.  Should the pigs get their way, residents won’t be blissful for long.

Even if you don’t want to speak, your presence will say to the council that you care, and that you’re paying attention.  Tonight – Town Hall – 7pm

Felicia Penn said it best:

Here’s An Interesting Item….

Anybody know how much the Town paid Mike Daley for this report?

Where’s our sensitivity training?!!!!!

CLICK TO OPEN FILE   review zoning enforcement[1]

LINDA EDSON’S DEPOSITION

CLICK to open.  Last 20 pages are pretty amazing…

Linda Edson’s deposition